Air can supply a raw material for making starch. Take a vote, then explain your choice.

Separate what a study achieved from what it would take to use it widely.

I am not a climate scientist, but I care about climate and ecosystems.

AI can help us look for answers. We still need to check the original sources.

Which changes are affecting people's lives?

How are scientists, engineers and communities responding? What could we try?

Where is it happening, and who is affected?

Write down what you know, then what you still want to understand.

Ask a question, investigate, and make something you can show and test.

Feedback from classmates and people who might use it helps you improve it.

Project learning and learning through experience have long histories in education.

Looking back at your work helps you see what you still need to learn.

High Tech High's staircase project connects scale, geometry, design and construction.

Measuring, explaining, working together and revising are part of its value.

An interesting question still needs goals, sources and time.

Choice and ongoing feedback support each other.

Share your own judgment. Different views can stay in the conversation.

Name your sources and give specific reasons when discussing an idea.

Notice people and places around you. Find a question worth investigating.

Try a small experiment with tools you can access, then check the result.

Watching wildlife, measuring conditions and building things can all start a project.

Choose tools to fit the question: cameras, sensors, maps and code do different jobs.

Find a real situation before choosing what a tool might help with.

AI recognition can be wrong. It needs examples, review and testing.

Narrow a big problem to a place, a group of people or a measurable change.

Plan your sources, method and comparison. Record what remains uncertain.

Use the official resource links to choose stories about climate, coasts and disasters.

Note the place, date, visible changes and anything the report does not establish.

Describe a specific scene and how it affects daily life.

Separate what you saw from what you inferred.

Real footage records a particular place and time. A forecast describes possible changes.

A game's map and rules are teaching choices, not data about a real city.

El Niño involves interactions between the tropical Pacific Ocean and the atmosphere.

It is distinct from long-term warming. Explaining a particular disaster requires specific evidence.

Public health problems can affect schools, transport, families and supply systems.

Research accidents, disease transmission and deliberate misuse are different questions. Each requires evidence.

As research advances, ask who consents, who reviews it and who bears the risks.

Research under lawful oversight must be distinguished from illegal misuse.

Stretch your legs and get some water.

When we return, we will take responsibility for a town together.

Electricity supports refrigeration. Roads support deliveries. Information shapes decisions.

Pick one connection and explain what happens in between.

Food also needs safe transport, storage and distribution.

Conflict and disasters can interrupt these steps, far beyond the farm.

Open UNDRR's original Stop Disasters! game and choose the flood scenario.

Four groups share one budget. Say who you want to protect, then propose one action.

Check the risk of the site. Record the location, cost and expected effect.

Take turns proposing and acting. After the flood, find something surprising in the game's report.

What did we do? What did the report show?

Change one thing and plan a comparison. A single result does not establish cause and effect.

A made-up classroom claim: connecting an AI weather model will automatically prevent losses.

Find the missing steps. Once a forecast exists, who still needs to decide and act?

Check the publisher, date, method and conditions.

Distinguish a news report, an experiment and a technology already in widespread use.

Replace absolute claims with statements that name their scope and conditions.

Say what is still unknown instead of hiding the gap behind fluent words.

What did you think before? Which source or piece of feedback changed it?

What question is worth returning to tomorrow?